well for heaven's sakes, 580 times more children drown in swimming pools. >> if you felt it was invasion of privacy for them to publish the addresses. why is the response to do the same thing yourself? why does the end justify these means? how is it different than what they did? >> it's a logical fallacy i agree to say you did it, too. on the other hand, frankly, i'm not a big fan of the media and i felt they were using this to harass gun owners, solely to harass gun owners so i harassed them back. >> so you're not a big fan of the media, why sit here in the media and talk about it? >> in the hope that i can provide my side of a gun owner's perspective. >> so you like the media when it benefits you. >> you invited me, sir. >> i'm asking. if you don't like something then you still do it, the same point ron is making if you don't like the invasion of privacy when it comes to who owns guns but you're publishing. you're saying one thing but do another. >> i'm a writer, a publisher. my name and photograph are right on my blog. they can contact me, my cell phone number is there. >> what kind o